Why biotechnology is still not the absolute replacement of passwords

A good security token is your token that no one can know, guess or copy. This is why security experts suggest we use long, random passwords for our safety. However, it is not as easy as it sounds because it is difficult to keep strong and unique passwords.

Biotechnology as we now know is the hot favorite technology to secure anywhere. It should have happened that counting is a hassle-free safe method of passwords that we must remember. In biometrics, our finger or thumb impressions not only make our job easier, they are also unique in nature.

Also, biotechnology has managed to eliminate the hacking issue as it is not an easy way for someone to hack your fingerprints instead of breaking the passcode. By following security best practices, setting up strong passwords for separate devices and then saving them every time is not easy compared to biometrics.

So, if the biometric system looks better in every department, why is there a need for improvement? Why is technology still not a smart alternative to annoying passwords?

First of all, it is a proven fact that biometrics will play an important role in validation in the future. But we have to understand that the system is not a cure for everything right now. There are still many prevailing problems that must be taken care of in order to make the technology completely immune.

Many researchers around the world have stated that it is not entirely true that biometrics cannot be rewritten because they attempt to trick fingerprint readers and succeed in bypassing digital scanners with some special glasses. Furthermore, initially incited biometrics retain all data stored on the server instead of restricting it to the client, so penetration of the security system is not impossible in this case scenario.

Last year, it was reported that at the U.S. Office of Human Resources Management, millions of government employees who had touched identity were stolen, which raised doubts about the technology first. To immediately confirm the threat, mobile phone companies have quickly changed the hardware's fingerprint system by adding password security behind the Touch ID.

This data breach showed that biometrics are not flawless. In fact, they simply avoided passwords. An account of this matter can become a major problem if no one can log in with their own Touch ID, all software companies starting Microsoft Windows 10 and Google Android have also provided a password tool to ensure this does not happen. .

Therefore, it is not recommended to rely on biometric authentication at this time because keeping a backup in the form of passwords is very important. This process is called multi-factor authentication (MFA) where we can set biometrics as a two-way security measure, while other passwords.

Biometrics are actually a great way to check but the technology is not yet completely error proof. Therefore, it should not be seen as an explicit alternative to passwords, but rather it should be implemented side by side to enhance protection.

&

    Leave Your Comment

    Your email address will not be published.*